Tony Curtis Dies At The Age Of Eighty-five

Watch him eat up the screen in this scene from Some Like It Hot with Jack Lemmon and Marilyn Monroe.

Of all the people I could wish would never grow old, it’s the people that made us laugh.

James Pilant

Business Ethics – India

I wish there were more direct references to business ethics in the speeches of our politicians, and not just our politicians, the voices of the pulpit and law office are too often silent in this regard.

The is from a speech by the President of India, Shrimati Pratibha Devisingh Patil.

Finally, I would like to mention that business is for profit but it cannot be divorced from ethics. This basic principle should be the guiding principle for business houses and their management. For corporate India to become a credible partner in India’s progress, a trust based relationship between – government, organizations and society at large, is a must.

Forbidden Business Transactions – The Teachings Of Islam

One of my good friends suggested I look at a short (20 page) article that is basically a lecture by Shaikh Saalih bin Fawzaan Al-Fawzaan. (Yes, that’s all one name. Shaikh” is a title given out of respect to any scholar or elderly person in Arabic. His name is “Salih” and “bin Fawzaan” means the son of Fawzaan.)

This is a great summary of the teachings of Islam as applied to business ethics. It is most impressive. This civilization has a lot to say about what is a legitimate business practice, and they don’t shy away from the concept of right and wrong.

Listen to this -

Also, the scholars of Fiqh have stated that what falls under Najash is when a seller tells his customer: “I bought this item for such and such price”, lying about the price, so that the buyer may be fooled and buy the item at an increased value. Or it is when the seller says: “I was given this product at this price” or he says: “I received it for this much”, lying about the price. He only wants to fool the customers into bidding the price up to reach this alleged and false price, which he claims he spent for the item. This is from the Najash, which Allaah’s Messenger (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) forbade. It is a treachery and deception of the Muslims, and it is lying and disloyalty, for which he will be accountable for before Allaah. So what is obligatory on the seller is that he reveals the truth if the buyer asks him how much he got it for. He must tell him the truth and not say that he attained it for this much money, lying about the price. What also falls into the definition of An-Najash is if the people of the marketplace or the storeowners agree to not outbid one another when an item is presented for sale, for the purpose of forcing the owner to sell it for a (discounted) cheaper price. So therefore, they are all participating in this act, which is Haraam. And this is from An-Najash. It is also a form of taking the people’s money unjustly.

Where do we in this culture have the courage to call the continuous wall of “PR” lies and distortions, treachery and deception? That’s wonderful teaching. Now there is much in this that is not in accordance with the common beliefs in the United States, but is not every single branch of the Christian religion committed like the religion of Islam to avoid the things of this world and not to be worldly? Is that not repeatedly stated in the New Testament?

A dose of of the business ethics teaching of Islam would not be to the detriment of this country, it would be a blessing.

James Pilant

Net Neutrality – Where Is The President?

During the campaign two years ago, Obama repeatedly stated his support for net neutrality – Watch!

Did you hear that – “I will take a backseat to no one.” Backseat! He might as well be in the trunk for all the help he’s been.

“I am a strong supporter of net neutrality.” Okay, that’s good. How about NOW? Where is he?

“I’m a big believer in net neutrality.” Still nice, but how about saying something now?

“I remain firmly committed to net neutrality.” Is he still? I don’t have anyway to know.

Okay, guys, probably you’ve seen enough. I can find more clips. I’ve already seen them. The open internet is under attack right now at the FCC and in Congress. A bill was considered a few days ago, that would have essentially ratified the agreement between Google and Verizon dividing up the internet and giving broadband to corporations. The attacks are well funded and continuous. The President referred to the danger of large companies getting control in his many speeches.

Where is he now? Where is the President of the United States? Where are all his pretty words? If he doesn’t speak soon, he will only be commenting on the division of the web into corporate sectors after it’s done.

If there is no net neutrality, this web site may become so slow as not to be viable or simply not deemed worthy of band width. Under the new rules, the FCC cannot issue any regulations but can hear complaints. Thus, if I am treated wrongly I will be able to complain to the FCC and should they decide in my favor after months during which my audience has gone away to other sites approved by the great media companies, that will fix everything, right? I’ll be all whole and returned to where I was. Right?

There are tens of thousands of sites like mine. And these voices cry out for advocacy for the poor, or the environment, etc.., some cry out for political action, …., some broadcast every crazy theory you can imagine, … and some are people just crying out that they are there – they are significant – they are important – they plead for attention and recognition.

And soon, these voices will be silent, their bandwidth divied up for movie companies and media channels and, of course, the occasional lapse where they allow a semi-independent voice to speak.

Pretty words are not the same as action. Eloquence is not the same as standing up for your beliefs. Political expedience cannot be an excuse of inaction where action has been repeatedly promised.

Where is the President? Did he mean any of that stuff he said? Is there time left for him to do or say anything?

James Pilant

Making The Evil Suffer!

People ask me what can be done about corporate crime. Usually I say, “Enforce the laws we have on the books and make them do real prison time as well as pay fines.” That will go along way to stopping that kind of crime.

But there is something, we all can do – we can take our moral responsibilities seriously.

You see we depend on the state to enforce the law and generally we assume that is enough. It is not.

When a white collar criminal walks the street after a wrist slap of a fine, justice is defied and the nation tarnished.

But You have a duty to justice as well. People would think twice about committing crime if the passive acceptance that justice was done by prison or fine disappeared as people realized their continuing duty. How do you exercise your duty for justice? When you meet one of these thieves, walk to the other side of the street, refuse to shake their hand. When these criminals are hired by a new company that explains blithely that they want their expertise, you can stop doing business with that company.

But above all it is our silence that demonstrates our lack of commitment to the principles of justice and citizenship. These criminal should be afraid to walk the streets not because of physical danger but because they are likely to be cut or insulted.

“White collar” criminals (and I truly hate that phrase – whoever commits serious crimes against the larger society to the tune of millions of dollars is a scoundrel and a disgrace to be shunned and despised just like the lowest bank robber) live in a cocoon of comfort. They go to the right churches, have the right friends, zealous business writers will minimize or deny their guilt, and their connections in industry and government continue unabated. Everything they hear is that everybody does it and if only the little people, the little people like you, could understand their job pressures and the unreasonable nature of the regulations, and the cruelty of the prosecutor and the randomness of it all – (other people have done worse so why arrest me), you would not persecute them like Christ on the Cross but honor their contributions to society.

You have a duty to justice to shock them out of that cocoon, to make it hard for them to get work, to stigmatize them and make them suffer. Justice does not stop at the prison door. If we can maintain records of where pedophiles live, surely we can track the financial offenders who have stolen so much and damaged society so thoroughly.

It is for you as well as the government to wield the sword of justice. Do not forget your duty. Do not forget your nation and your responsibility to it. Remember the evil that these men have done.

Do not harm them physically, take them down a peg. Don’t hurt their bodies, hurt their feelings.

I tell you truly when the great malefactors of this society are punished by the public in this fashion, a very large portion of this kind of crime will simply disappear.

When we act as negatively toward a white collar criminal as we do a man wearing a shirt and pants with opposite patterns, when we are as critical of these criminals as we are of people who live on the streets, when we are as uncomfortable in their presence as when a thoughtless person talks loud and long on their cell phone, they will change their behavior.

James Pilant

The Problem of Monopoly

You are probably aware that one of the airlines will no longer serve food on flights. This is an outgrowth of the concentration of airlines as their numbers diminish. If you don’t have to compete; you don’t have to provide services or make your pricing competitive. Every American who uses air travel will face increasing fees and dismal service because in a monopoly you don’t have to do a good job or provide a decent service. You have to pay them anyway.

This is Edward Lotterman writing in the Pioneer Press -

Increasing monopoly power can get you coming and going, especially at the airport. The decreased competition in air travel resulting from successive mergers among airlines has already increased air fares. Now a pending take-over of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group by either Hertz or Avis promises to reduce competition once you are off the plane.

But these days, questions of monopoly power seem a dead issue in Congress and among the general public. Such apathy is true even in the face of growing concentration in banking and financial services, where just three banks now hold a third of all deposits and are making well over half of new mortgage loans. Teddy Roosevelt must be turning over in his grave.

Deathbonds! Gambling On Death – Just The Elderly!

In a special report, Reuters tells a fascinating and horrifying story, a tale of intrigue, death and bizarre financial manipulation.

This story is about life settlement products. It’s a very comfortable sounding name for something far more sinister, the purchase of insurance policies statistically figured to pay off because of the death of the original owner.

From the article -

Life settlement products first appeared in the mid-1990s. Typically, the market is fed by elderly individuals with life expectancies of between 3 and 12 years. U.S. settlement companies buy these life insurance policies at a fraction of their face value, but above their cash surrender values, picking up the tab for insurance premiums and collecting on the death benefit — or policy maturity.

Industry proponents say that as long as the models used to predict the deaths of underlying policy holders are broadly correct, a suitably large portfolio should offer a healthy return, despite the industry’s often eyewatering commissions and fees — as much as 10 percent upfront — and the lack of generally agreed rules about how to value portfolios.

At what point, did we as a society arrive here? We are at a place where gambling on the time of death of the elderly is a legitimate way of making money. I’m not talking about life insurance. That’s a long term deal in which both parties benefit. I’m talking about buying out insurance policies for a fraction of their value and making a killing on the early deaths of the holders.

Well, let’s look at the rule of the business world’s favorite economist – “There is one and only one social responsibility of business–to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud”

I would note that what counts as the “rules of the game” seems to be rather flexible, and if you can figure out why any businessman would engage in free and open competition, you’re one up on me. As for deception and fraud, on everything from bank fees to credit cards, making sure that knowledge is limited and initial offers inviting, has created whole industries based on oversell by obscuring the facts.

I would argue that the only part of that statement, that businesses in the United States heard, was the unconditional purpose of making money as the only, single rationale for business. This rule is not a fact, it is the beginning of an economic religion.

That’s how you get gambling on old dead people. It’s making money. It’s within the rules. There is competition. The deception or fraud does not directly violate law.

It takes an economic religion, a new set of sacred beliefs, to overrule the pangs of conscience, to disregard the duty of religion, to escape the burden of civilization and to be deaf to the pleas of the patriot.

That’s why we are here, a national moral vacuum.

James Pilant

Vice President Biden to Democratic Base: ‘Stop Whining’

Every once in a while you hear something you find hard to believe. This is a good example.”Stop whining.”

Would the Vice-President be directing that insult at the people who gave money, worked door to door and voted for him and the President?

Now whether the Democrats or Republicans do well in the coming election does not concern me. They have failed in their duty to protect the public from predatory lending, credit card gamesmanship, borderline fraud in the mortgage industry and many other persistent evils. So, “a plague on both their houses.”

However, the phrase, “Stop whining,” caught my attention. My blessed readers, if a single one of you thinks this will motivate the base, I want you to tell me. Just make a comment, a short phrase – “Biden knows what he’s doing.” That’s all I want to hear.

Just tell me that to someone, somewhere this make sense.

If so, I will never bring it up again. In fact I may very well give up saying anything about Joe Biden. That may well be the wisest course.

James Pilant

Americans Believe Recession (Depression) Is Not Over

From a CNN story -

Seventy-four percent of Americans believe the economy is still in a recession, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll. Only 25 percent think the downturn is over.

One-third of Americans say the recession is serious, while another 29 percent characterize it as moderate.

Only the elite in the beltway believe the ridiculous idea that we have successfully come through the recession. I don’t understand how the numbers could add up to anything but a continuing crisis.

Unemployment – 9.6 percent – This doesn’t count those who have given up seeking work, so the real number is probably closer to 15.

Financial Markets – All Better? – NO – Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh said on Tuesday that financial markets have not fully recovered after the financial crisis and that economic growth is currently weighted to government expansion.

Hiring – All better? – NO – U.S. chief executive officers’ view of the economy darkened in the third quarter, with top executives saying they were less willing to hire new workers as they fear sales growth will slow.

Consumer Confidence – Optimistic? – NO – When it comes to attitudes about the economy, Americans continue to see the glass as half empty, according to the latest reading on consumer morale. The Consumer Confidence Index fell to 48.5 in September — its lowest level in 7 months — and down from August’s negatively revised level of 53.2, the Conference Board, a New York-based research group that compiles the index, said Tuesday.

How long can I keep going? How long have you got?

The politicians and the commentators feel your pain from a safe distance. You’re just more economic data and an annoying one. If you would only believe, everything would be fine. Everybody is doing well. You just don’t see it because you can’t see the big picture obstructed as it is by your suffering. Don’t be pessimistic. Don’t you know that this is America and a good attitude can solve all your problems?

I get tired. You get up and you hear these criticisms of hard working Americans and the utter lack of comprehension of the beltway elites as to what the world is really like, and the next day it happens again. The cycle never ends. Americans are lazy, self-indulgent, and fat. They need to get tough, get smart and do what we, the real people, the people that count do. Learn from us, they say. These creatures who don’t live in a world of labor and pain, who live by manipulating money, shaping opinion, and other ill defined processes. They know how to fix your lives. Right, and I can build a nuclear weapon with a little barb wire and an old tire.

Well, tomorrow will be another day and the cycle will begin again.

James Pilant

My Buddy, Andrew, Comments On The Posting – Are Businessmen Smarter Than Children

As usual, Andrew has something clever to add to one of my posts. I would like you to read it. jp

A few years ago, I did an internship at the CSX Rail Yard in Waycross, GA. One day in the middle of september, I came in to hear that the EPA man was coming today to inspect the yard. As the intern, I was at the bottom of the food chain, and it was my job that day to escort the EPA man around to all of the facilities in the yard.

The inspection lasted until a little after lunch time. At almost every facility we went to, he wrote stuff down in this book he carried with him. At the end of the inspection, we went and met with the Plant Manager of the Locomotive Service/Repair Station, who is the man in charge of the entire yard. That day, CSX got fined $350,000 for environmental hazards and failure to comply with EPA regulations.

What suprised me is the reaction to this. CSX considered this a victory! “We ONLY got charged $350,000!!”. I understand that type of money is a drop in the bucket for what the major railroads make, but the moral issue there is what upset me.

I just thought I’d share my example to help further verify what you learned in law school.